Hi Adam, On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 22:21 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 18:58 -0300, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 19:30 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > > If the diff for squeeze is the same as the diff for lenny then that > > > should be okay, but a mail to -release would still be appreciated. > > > > > > Here [0] you will found the diff for squeeze. > > > > [0] http://people.debian.org/~metal/magpierss/ > > Thanks. The patch itself looks okay, but it doesn't appear to have been > added to debian/patches/series, so isn't applied in the resulting binary > package.
Wow, my bad. > I've just spotted that the same is true for the lenny package. Would > you like to upload 0.72-5+lenny2 adding the patch to series, or prefer > that I reject +lenny1 so that you can upload a fixed package using that > version number? The lenny version uses cdbs + simple-patchsys, so there is no series file. Only squeeze version is wrong. I fixed it and uploaded it here [0] again. [0] http://people.debian.org/~metal/magpierss/ Cheers, -- Marcelo Jorge Vieira xmpp:me...@jabber-br.org http://metaldot.alucinados.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
