On 19/02/11 at 22:45 +0300, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > retitle 587893 ITP: tdbc -- Tcl Database Connectivity (TDBC) > owner 587893 ! > thanks > > On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 05:08:11PM +0000, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > [...] > > This is an automatic email to change the status of tdbc back from ITP > > (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't > > seen > > any activity during the last 6 months. > > > > If you are still interested in adopting tdbc, please send a mail to > > <cont...@bugs.debian.org> with: > > > > retitle 587893 ITP: tdbc -- Tcl Database Connectivity (TDBC) > > owner 587893 ! > > thanks > > > > However, it is not recommended to keep ITP for a long time without acting on > > the package, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from > > packaging that software. It is also a good idea to document your progress on > > this ITP from time to time, by mailing <587...@bugs.debian.org>. > > Hi! > > Actually, the situation with this package is a bit weird: it's ready and > builds OK (modulo some lintian warnings about man pages -- reported > upstream and is being worked on there), but to be actually usable it > requires the next prospective beta release of Tcl 8.6 which is not done > yet, and Tcl maintainer does not want to package the trunk's HEAD (he > has valid reasons for this), so I do not proceed with the upload. > > Is there any way to somehow mark the package as ready but just not > having its prime time for uploading? > > (Of course, I'm fine with regaining the ownership of this bug from time > to time, -- just curious whether there's a better idea.)
Hi, My script only touches bugs that have not been modified during the last 6 months. So, if you remember to post a status update from time to time, then it's fine. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
