On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 12:43 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 11:32 +0000, Paul Martin wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:25:49AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > > > > BTW: I got a reply from upstream, saying that they would adopt my > > > current patch. Maybe you can communicate with them directly about the > > > new changes, in order to further improve the changes. > > > > Who was it that you contacted at RedHat?
Did you get in contact with the upstream developers? How does your modified patch look like? I thought of your proposal to use strdup instead of strcpy. In that case you avoid the alloca calls, at the cost of finding the correct places where to free the strings malloced by strdup. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
