On 8 Feb 2011, at 21:52, Achim Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Package: archfs > Version: 0.5.4-2 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > there is a new name and homepage for this: > http://code.google.com/p/rdiff-backup-fs/ > > As well the version changed, so now we have a 1.0.0 version. > Please package it. Hi, thanks for your report. The upstream author has already been in touch and work on packaging is due to begin soon. Note that because the name has changed, the updated package will have to go through the NEW queue, which will unfortunately cause some delay (especially right now, as the queue has an amazing 400+ packages in it!) For future reference, requests for New upstream versions of packages should be filed against the source of the package (src:archfs) rather than a specific binary package version. > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 6.0 > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > Versions of packages archfs depends on: > ii fuse-utils 2.8.4-1.1 Filesystem in USErspace > (utilities > ii libc6 2.11.2-11 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared > lib > ii libfuse2 2.8.4-1.1 Filesystem in USErspace library > ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime > > archfs recommends no packages. > > archfs suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
