tags 609813 + patch
tags 609813 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for atftp (versioned as 0.7.dfsg-9.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer or remove it from the queue.
Note, the decision to NMU is due to the importance of the bug
and because the most recent attempts to contact the maintainer
at the maintainer address have resulted in bounces.
Regards,
tony
diff -u atftp-0.7.dfsg/tftpd.c atftp-0.7.dfsg/tftpd.c
--- atftp-0.7.dfsg/tftpd.c
+++ atftp-0.7.dfsg/tftpd.c
@@ -256,6 +256,10 @@
if (!tftpd_port)
tftpd_port = sockaddr_get_port(&sa);
+ else {
+ sa.ss_family = AF_INET;
+ sockaddr_set_port(&sa, tftpd_port);
+ }
freeaddrinfo(result);
}
diff -u atftp-0.7.dfsg/debian/changelog atftp-0.7.dfsg/debian/changelog
--- atftp-0.7.dfsg/debian/changelog
+++ atftp-0.7.dfsg/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+atftp (0.7.dfsg-9.3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Apply patch listen on requested port when in daemon mode.
+ Thanks to Len Sorensen. (Closes: #609813)
+
+ -- tony mancill <tmanc...@debian.org> Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:58:05 -0800
+
atftp (0.7.dfsg-9.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
