Hi, On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 04:49:50PM +0100, Debian wrote: > Am 22.01.2011 15:28, schrieb Rene Engelhard: > >>Open Office is getting really more unstable after the last update of the > >>packages. > >"last update"? From what to what? You mean -10 to -11. There was *NOTHING* > >changed > >in OOo code there. Just build stuff, and that won't affect *anything* in the > >code. > >Probably a problem in some external library? > > When *NOTHING* has changed, why the packages has been updated?
Because you didn't read all what I wrote. > openoffice.org-core:amd64 (3.2.1-9, 3.2.1-10), libbluetooth3:amd64 > (4.66-2, 4.66-3) > End-Date: 2011-01-02 23:45:16 > > Many OO packages for nothing ... Well, when one package gets fixed *all* packages gets updated. That's a given given the infrastructure we have. Now, let's look. At the changelog. openoffice.org (1:3.2.1-11) unstable; urgency=medium * use dpkg -s instead of apt-cache show (closes: #607873) -- Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:59:29 +0100 openoffice.org (1:3.2.1-10) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/patches/slideshow-clipfix.diff: add patch from ooo-build-3-2-1 branch to fix clipping in slideshow (closes: #605120) -- Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:27:31 +0000 3.2.1-9 is a two line-fix for *impress* only. -10 is just a fix for debian/rules, nothing in the app itself. > >>There are many bug reports i read where i have the same problem. > >>I would suggest to go to the version before. This version was running > >>better. > >Nonsense. Besides that it's the worst time to do that NOW in deep freeze. > >And you don't > >really want to suggest re-adding RC bugs to the package so the squeeze > >eventually > >wil not release with OOo at all? > > Ah - RC bugs has been fixed. So things have changed! See above. The RC bugfix was the one in -10. > Some things fixed and some new bugs in. Nonsense. Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
