On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:38:28AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Richard Mortimer <ri...@oldelvet.org.uk>
> > So that means that the kernel is complaining about type 54 which is
> > R_SPARC_UA64. That matches with the objdump output which doesn't list
> > R_SPARC_LM22 for scsi_mod.ko
>
> Indeed, good catch :-)
> That makes things different, I'll look into this, thanks.
If I see this correctly, then _UA64 is the same then _64 except for the
alignment requirements; similar to _UA32 and _32. So this should be
fixed by the following patch.
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/module.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/module.c
index ee3c7dd..4d55a43 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/module.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/module.c
@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ int apply_relocate_add(Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
switch (ELF_R_TYPE(rel[i].r_info) & 0xff) {
#ifdef CONFIG_SPARC64
case R_SPARC_64:
+ case R_SPARC_UA64:
location[0] = v >> 56;
location[1] = v >> 48;
location[2] = v >> 40;
--
Spock: We suffered 23 casualties in that attack, Captain.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
