Hi Don & others, On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 05:58, Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:16:32PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> > All that said, one of the few remaining actions I can take on this >> > issue is to friendly ping the tech-ctte to actually decide on this >> > issue, open for 7 months now. I do think tech-ctte is a very useful >> > device in Debian and I want Debian to trust it as an efficient device; >> > I would appreciate if you can help me out toward this worthwhile goal. >> > >> > If you think I can help in any other way, please let me know, I'll >> > gladly do whatever I can and/or I'm empowered to. >> > >> > >> > Thanks a lot for your work, you've all my sympathies for the decision >> > you're asked to make. >> >> As ~2 more months have passed without a comment, I can't do any better >> than pinging the CTTE again, AOL-ing the text above (especially the last >> paragraph). > > I believe the CTTE needs to revisit this and see what the current > status is and if there are still remaining issues which need to be > worked through. I'll try to get a status report on this by the end of > this week and see where we are at.
Thanks for that, it's really appreciated! If the re-evaluation will include a round of private conversations with "key people", then I think it would be fair if you would also include the original appellers that didn't get contacted in the first place. Thanks in advance, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
