On 01/01/2011 01:35 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 17:08 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: >> I don't know whether to report this bug against paml-doc or >> ftp.debian.org. > > It's definitely a bug in paml. Arguably dak shouldn't allow the > situation to occur in the archive, but the package is wrong. > >> After doing a package list update today, I noticed paml-doc showing up >> in the "non-free/doc" section. I don't have non-free in my >> sources.list, just main. Investigating, I found that paml-doc 4.4c-2 >> shows up in http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/paml/ and in the >> Packages.gz for main. > > This is due to the source package having: > > Source: paml > Section: non-free/science > [...] > Package: paml-doc > Architecture: all > Section: doc > > The binary package should be in non-free/doc.
Fixed in the Debian Med svn now. I'll upload later today. If I am not errorneous, the assignment of "doc" was happening by blindly following a note of lintian that requested the section "doc" for a package name ending with "-doc". I need to investigate http://lintian.debian.org/tags/wrong-section-according-to-package-name.html It was not clear to me, that the initial assignment of the non-free distribution could be removed for individual packages. Many thanks Steffen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
