I've looked at the provided patch, and I don't think it's correct. First of all, we have vsscanf in glibc, so there's no reason that we should need to provide one. Second, if this code is built as a shared library, which I believe it is, then we've just exported a symbol by removing the "static". That's bad because (a) it conflicts with glibc, which may cause linking problems and crashes, and (b) other shared libraries may use this vsscanf, which will not work if there are more than five stdarg arguments.
The right way to fix this is to find out why HAVE_VSSCANF is not be defined properly. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 832 623 2791 | http://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b: 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
