On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 00:12 +0000, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > What about "numa=fake=1"? I think that should force it to create a > single NUMA node.
Is there any advantage to this vs numa=noacpi? Do they effectively end up doing the same thing? > IanC: it looks like passing a node id of "-1" is the correct way to > say "I don't care". I thought so too but convinced myself from staring at the code that it wouldn't work in this case -- I'll double check before I resubmit. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
