Hi Julien,
On Montag, 15. November 2010, Julien Valroff wrote:
> This is not valid as dspam-webfrontend does depend on (lib)dspam (>=
> ${source:Version}) which is not in the archive, hence the error is caused
> by these missing dependencies. It seems however apt-get should fail more
> gracefully, but this is out of topic here.
so, automatically rescheduling packages which have "E: Packages need to be
removed but remove is disabled." in their failed logs could help (in some
cases) here, right?
(There are only 9 such failures in sid and 6 in squeeze atm.)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
