On 11/17/2010 05:28 PM, Csillag Kristof wrote: > 2010-11-17 17:07 keltezéssel, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko írta: > >> >> >> Hmm looks like Debian lags behind more than I thought. The version in >> question is upstream trunk available as bzr checkout from >> http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/grub/trunk/grub/ >> Perhaps it needs no patching at all. Could you test? >> > Because of various reasons, I am using grub-legacy, not grub2. > Again, for various reasons, I still need grub-common from grub2. > > So, my current installation is: > > grub-common 1.98+20100804 > grub-legacy 0.97-63 > > As far as I understand, this is perfectly valid and supported combination, > so I have no intention to change this. > > Now, the upstream source (which I have checked out with bzr) is not > Debianized, > and I am not familiar with the grub build system, so I am not able to build > and install grub-common only, without messing up my (somewhat fragile) > configuration. > > So, the short answer is that no, I can not test the upstream source without > your help. If you can help me get a Debianized version of it, than I > can do it. > You don't have to actually install it. You can test grub-probe without installing: bzr branch http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/grub/trunk/grub/ cd grub ./autogen.sh make sudo ./grub-probe -t fs -v / > Thank you. > > Kristof > > >
-- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
