On 11/16/2010 07:15 AM, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 13:10 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> We can argue about whether it's appropriate to go ahead and render the >> page anyway, but it does not seem to be the case that the browser is >> not performing *any* >> ssl certificate checking. > > It _is_ performing an SSL certificate check - it does let you know the > SSL certificate is "broken", right? It would say it is OK if the > certificate was OK. Why do you say it isn't?
i suspect you're misinterpreting what i wrote (probably because i wrote
it confusingly -- sorry!). I agree with you: epiphany *is* doing
certificate checking.
I was following up on a bug report that claims it is not doing checking,
and describing why i disagreed with that interpretation.
Regards,
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
