On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:10:31PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:07:22PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > First, I think that we might just end up removing corekeeper entirely,
> >
> > Hmm, I think it sounds like a useful package. I was thinking about
> > using it on workstations with NFS homes to keep core dumps of several
> > GB away from NFS mounted directories.
>
> Thanks for the feedback. Maybe I'll just break it apart into a new
> source package, then, as you suggest.
I made a new source package available here:
http://openvswitch.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=corekeeper;a=summary
I haven't changed the architecture yet, though, because I'm not quite
sure what to do. corekeeper is completely architecture independent
(it's only shell scripts) but it only works on Linux. I can't use "all"
as the architecture, because it only works on Linux, but "linux-any"
will cause the package to be needlessly rebuilt on each GNU/Linux
architecture. "linux-all" would seem to be what I want, but it isn't
valid. Should I just use "linux-any"?
Thanks,
Ben.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
