On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:29:24AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
Hi Jonas,

On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:24:54AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 08:56:13AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
both sugar-tools-0.90 and sugar-session-0.90 ar not installable in sid on any architecture, since

 sugar-session-0.90 (= 0.90.3-1) depends on missing: - python-sugar-0.90
 sugar-tools-0.90 (= 0.90.3-1) depends on missing: - python-sugar-0.90

As a consequence, sucrose-0.90 and sugar-emulator-0.90 are not installable as well as these depend on sugar-session-90.

This is weird: I agree with above, but wonder how those packages went missing - I have notes on succesful upload to unstable for them :-/

maybe it had been kept back because of the freeze?

Recently I had encountered a similar problem where a package had disappeared from (or not shown up in) unstable (bug #601071). You might want to ask Al what he did to solve it.

Ahh, I see now that it is simply not approved by ftp-masters yet. I use http://qa.debian.org/[email protected]&comaint=yes and simply forgot to also check the "Pending uploads" section.


 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to