On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:11, Aaron M. Ucko <[email protected]> wrote: > Vincent Bernat <[email protected]> writes: > >> listener. Moreover, this is not 100% reliable.
OK, then we will avoid unoconv. Thanks Vincent. > > I was afraid there might be further complications with unoconv/OO.o, > hence my suggestion to split the package (which would, however, require > another pass through NEW. :-/) > > Another possibility might be to use ooo2dbk in conjunction with > docbook-utils, dblatex, or the like. > >> Maybe this is is better to keep the documentation in sxw format? > > Perhaps, though I'd suggest trying to keep the PDF if feasible. The pdf comes with upstream tarball, we were just regenerating it out of principle. I think we can just install the upstream provided one. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
