On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:11:32AM +0000, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > Damian, Sorry I should have made myself clearer. I was not suggesting > that Dominique's idea would help - except as very, very long shot. > Rather We have two bugs in assassin that have at sometime implicated > NetAddr::IP. #517361 is a separate bug > but at present I cannot investigate further without help from people who > know spamassasin. Obviously it is spamassasin's interests to squash as > many NetAddr::IP bugs as possible. So I am suggesting that someone using > spamassasin helps me test Dominuque's idea and I react proactively to > any NetAddr::IP issues.
Please refer to a previous update that I made to this bug. [1] That message contains a small program, as well as sample correct and incorrect output. That program is essentially the part of spamassassin that is generating warnings based on the change in behavior observed in NetAddr::IP. noah 1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601601#37
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
