Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:06:48PM +0200, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> > I've not tested anything but I may have found the cause for this
> > problem. Freshly extracted, the source package contains some cruft which
> > gets removed upon running debian/rules clean. Specifically,
> > [...]
> > pdns-2.9.17/debian/doc-base
> > pdns-2.9.17/debian/pdns-doc.postinst
> > pdns-2.9.17/debian/pdns-doc.prerm
> > pdns-2.9.17/debian/pdns.conffiles
> > pdns-2.9.17/debian/pdns.postinst
> > pdns-2.9.17/debian/pdns.postrm
> > pdns-2.9.17/debian/pdns.prerm
> > pdns-2.9.17/debian/shlibs.local
>
> Matthijs and I believe Jeremie could be right. In Joey's build logs it
> appears like the "clean" target hasn't been called during the build
Correct. make build and make binary is called.
> process. We aren't happy that the upstream was shipping a debian/
> directory along with the tarball and this might well be the cause that
> the build broke.
I don't understand since the only directories in debian/ are:
./CVS
./po
./config
./patches
./manpage
None of them looks like debian/tmp or debian/$packagename to me.
> As a fix we could re-create the upstream tarball with the debian/
> directory removed from it. That should fix this issue. On the downside
> we would have to alter the orig file. Everyone's in favor?
Not for sarge.
Regards,
Joey
--
Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
