Hi, Am Sonntag, den 24.10.2010, 11:41 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:48:48AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > yes, if there were a (virtual) ghci package. This is planned for the > > next ghc release. In fact, I am suggesting even more virtual packages > > (ghci, ghc-th, ghc-threaded) in case the ghci ~ th equivalency stops to > > hold some time, and for the packages needing a threaded RTS. > > > > But for unstable, this is not yet in place. > > Ok. edos-debcheck will cope with purely virtual packages. For the current > sbuild resolver I'm not so sure, but we'll see.
should that matter? The packages will be in BD-Uninstallable indefinitely, which would give the desired result. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer [email protected] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: [email protected] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
