Hi, Am Sonntag, 10. Oktober 2010, 21:04:23 schrieb Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta: > And the maintainer is not really sure about the benefits of this split. > Mainly because it makes not sense to have a 'openvpn' package containing > nothing useful (examples, docs, and the init.d script) and a package with > just the binary (no init.d, no /etc/openvpn/,...).
Just because the openvpn package does not contain anything useful *on its own*, as long as the package depends on the right things it still isn't useless. (In my proposal I implied a dependency of openvpn on openvpn-core) > The init script does > nothing if you/NetworkManager don't feed /etc/openvpn, and it exits with > a warning, not an error, so who/whatever monitors that, should be able > to tell the difference :) the init script exits with a non-zero exit status, which was the main reason why this wish has been written. Using systemd as init system openvpn shows up in systemctl: > openvpn.service loaded failed failed LSB: Openvpn VPN service (I'm not informed enough to judge whether the fault is with the openvpn init script, or systemd, or the LSB specification.) Eckhart -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
