Hello Rene, SkyRaT [2010-09-29 12:11 +0200]: > Aptitude automatically marked the meta-package "postgresql" as > upgradeable and so installed all 9.0 related packages and upgraded > the postgresql-common to version 111. So maybe wrong order of > installing these packages???
No, this sounds fine. > Can you try to reproduce the problem? I can also try again... I'm doing this all the time, and the test suite does a lot of that. As I said, the problem might lay in a particular way of configuring the ports, only listening to particular interfaces, not having an Unix socket or having it in a wrong directory, etc. Therefore it is not easy to reproduce, and thus I asked for your postgresql.conf. > I also think, a part of the solution generally is to get the > postinst script in the package NOT depend on a successful execution > of the service. Of course it should throw a BIG-FAT-WARNING, that > the service was unable to start, but should not fail with the > installation. That's the current standard practice of Debian packages, though. Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
