Hi Philipp, [...]
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:39:31PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > [Note; this has been discussed before, but there never was a > > real conclusion, but we need to discuss/fix this for Squeeze]: > > As discussed we can retain clamav in stable under the assumption that > the maintainer help with preparing new clamav upstream versions for > stable. Security updates will also use new upstream versions as > seen fit. The amount of rdeps is minimized for the squeeze cycle > to lower the impact of ABI bumps. > Is there any actual work to be done to minimize the rdeps or is it just "we intend to do this"? Thanks a lot, Michael
pgpRgZdjnDuiF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
