On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:27:00PM +0000, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 03:45:12PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Also, for ease of transition, ideally x-terminal-emulator could refer to
> > sensible-term, and the real x-terminal-emulator alternative would live
> > under some other name that sensible-term could call.  This would avoid
> > the need to fix umpteen programs which already use x-terminal-emulator.
> 
> Then it couldn't fall back to x-terminal-emulator.

"and the real x-terminal-emulator alternative would live under some
other name that sensible-term could call".  For example,
"x-terminal-emulator.real".

In any case, just a suggestion for ease of transition.


By the way, I reported this bug without the obvious patch included
because I wanted to discuss the correct behavior of the sensible-term
script first.  As soon as we agree on the correct behavior, I'll happily
write the corresponding sensible-term script implementing that behavior.

Thanks,
Josh Triplett



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to