Norbert Preining <[email protected]> writes: > On Mi, 25 Aug 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Yeah, this is definitely the plan. As you've noticed, we also need to >> handle libglx, and the other packages should cooperate and set up the >> alternatives so that we don't have to do the current diversion trick, and > Hmm, that means: > xserver-xorg-core for libglx.so > libgl1-mesa-glx for libGL.so.1 > libgl1-mesa-dev for libGL.so And the fglrx packages, which are the easiest first step, I think. We should already be close to fglrx being able to use the same infrastructure that we're using for NVIDIA. > Sounds like a more long-term plan to convince xserver-xorg-core ... I've already talked to Julien about it a little bit. We of course will have to get it right and make sure it doesn't break anything, but I don't think it's completely infeasible. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
