[Arthur de Jong] > I've merged the recommends from both libnss-ldapd and libpam-ldapd > into those of nslcd. Since both packages depend on nslcd this should > accomplish the same thing and keep the list of PAM alternatives in > one place.
Great. I hope you get it into Squeeze, to avoid Debian Edu having to use a workaround to avoid duplicate pam settings on the machines. > So you are using the nss-pam-ldapd NSS module and sss for PAM? Is > this a reasonable configuration (since sss also provides an NSS > module)? Actually, we use sss for pam and nss, except for netgroups which is still not implemented in sss, so we ended up using ldapd for netgroups. :) Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
