At Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:19:41 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 06:03:23AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > I'm not sure this Suggests is appropriate: ijsgimpprint can't work > with cups without foomatic to provide the needed PPDs (from > foomatic-db-gutenprint, which IIRC need generating). Also, > ijsgimpprint no longer exists; the correct package (and IJS server > name) is ijsgutenprint.
> Even if the foomatic stuff is installed, the native CUPS driver is > surely the best choice (cupsys-driver-gutenprint), so I would be > reluctant to suggest a more complex alternative because of that: > the average user should only require the best supported, simplest > and most robust, and most well tested driver configuration. > > IMHO ijsgutenprint is only useful for non-CUPS spoolers which must > work with ghostscript-centric filters. Thanks, I see. I removed ijsgutenprint from Suggests: again. So.., how to treat this bug should we? reassign? Thanks, -- Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
