On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 07:53:03PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:24:51AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Package: linux-2.6 > > Severity: important > > Tags: security patch > > > > There are another two vulnerabilities fixed in 2.6.12.5, that might require > > backporting to 2.6.8 and 2.4.27. Please see > > http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/chrisw/linux-2.6.12.y.git;a=commit;h=885605316d76c3fdce23dffe9c59e20539287c6b > > for descriptions, links and patches. > > I have added this to linux-2.6 (except the bit that updates the kernel > version). > > For the record: > > sys_set_mempolicy-mode-check.patch > 2.6.8: Does not appear to have this problem 2.4.27: Does not appear to have this problem
> x86_64-srat-dual-core-amd.patch > 2.6.8: Does not appear to have this problem 2.4.27: Does not appear to have this problem > x86_64-fix-smpboot-timing-problem.patch > 2.6.8: Does not appear to have this problem 2.4.27: Does not appear to have this problem > linux-zlib-fixes.patch (CAN-2005-2458, CAN-2005-2459) > 2.6.8: Added as linux-zlib-fixes.dpatch 2.4.27: Added as 182_linux-zlib-fixes.diff > zisofs.patch > 2.6.8: Added as zisofs.dpatch Added as 183_zisofs.diff This smells like something that averts an overrun to me > key-session-join.patch: CAN-2005-2098 > 2.6.8: Does not appear to have this problem 2.4.27: Does not appear to have this problem > failed-keyring-oops.patch: CAN-2005-2099 > 2.6.8: Does not appear to have this problem 2.4.27: Does not appear to have this problem > module-per-cpu-alignment-fix.patch > 2.6.8: added as module-per-cpu-alignment-fix.dpatch 2.4.27: Does not appear to have this problem > I will try to get to 2.4.27 tomorrow. Done :) -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
