I demand that Yves-Alexis Perez may or may not have written... > On sam., 2010-07-24 at 12:27 +0100, Darren Salt wrote: >> thunar-data has a sento action for bluetooth-sendto, which isn't provided >> by blueman. However, there is an equivalent which is provided: >> blueman-sendto.
>> Essentially, this needs no more than a copy of bluetooth-sendto.desktop >> with s/bluetooth/blueman/g (or a symlink from bluetooth-sendto to >> blueman-sendto, which would be best done in blueman but would require the >> addition of Conflicts headers). > What do you mean? That the sendto file should be added in Thunar or in > blueman? Whichever's more practical. I mention it here because of bluetooth-sendto.desktop. > I'm not strongly opposed to add one (though that should be done > upstream, ideally), but at one point it's hard to say if thunar should ship > sendto files for each and every application, or if each and every > application should ship sendto files for each and every file manager (the > best would be a common spec for sendto files, imho) The apps should, because there are more of them; but, either way, it becomes a little silly if both blueman-sendo and bluetooth-sendto are available (which, I suppose, could happen if you have different users who prefer different desktop environments). It doesn't seem avoidable without extending the specification or telling them to hide entries. -- | Darren Salt | linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Toon | using Debian GNU/Linux | or ds ,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | back! | Let's keep the pound sterling After purchasing an item, you will find it on sale next week. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
