Hi Ansgar, many thanks for working quickly on my bug reports.
On 14/07/2010 18:03, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > The package from unstable builds fine in unstable. How is it possible if none of an older version of these packages is already installed? > It is not a release-critical bug if a package from unstable fails to > build in stable. I agree with that. I just used novice mode of reportbug tool and selected the more appropriate option without consideration about the used repository. Sorry for that. > It should work just fine if you remove the build-dep on > libtest-minimumversion-perl, libperl-minimumversion-perl in > libfile-find-rule-perl-perl. Build from source and installation of libfile-find-rule-perl-perl package works. Many thanks for that. > I still agree that we should avoid (indirect) build-deps on itself. For libperl-minimumversion-perl it isn't enough. I think I found others (indirect) build-deps on itself: libperl-minimumversion-perl needs libppi-perl (>= 1.205) libppi-perl needs libtest-subcalls-perl libtest-subcalls-perl needs libtest-minimumversion-perl libtest-minimumversion-perl needs libperl-minimumversion-perl libperl-minimumversion-perl needs libtest-script-perl (>= 1.03) libtest-script-perl needs libperl-minimumversion-perl and libtest-minimumversion-perl Best regards, Mounaam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
