Joachim Wiedorn writes ("Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader
LILO"):
> because of the discussions of the last weeks mostly on debian-devel I
> have sent this bug report:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587886
> to the Technical Committee of Debian to find a solution.
I've caught up on all of this now. I'm not sure I quite understand
the position of the current lilo maintainers. In
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/05/msg00769.html
William writes:
it has pretty much been determined that kernel sizes have crossed the
line past where lilo can reliably determine the payload size.
William, to what are you referring ? Can you provide a bug number ?
William and Matt: Can you confirm that you still intend to remove lilo
from squeeze ?
Do we have another person who wants to maintain lilo in Debian ?
I think that if we do, and the current maintainers want to remove it,
we should give the package to the maintainers who do not want to
remove it.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
