Re: Franck Joncourt 2010-07-03 <20100703193921.ge1...@diamond.stones.lan> > caff relies on gnupg default settings. And thus the user has to update his > configuration to move from sha1 to sha256 by adding the following lines to > caff's gnupg configuration file.
I have been wondering about this for some time: why do we need a separate GNUPGHOME at all? Using a separate keyring to store the new signatures should be enough and would save us all sorts of key copying. This would also nicely resolve this request. Re 527944, we shouldn't "fix" gnupg in caff. Christoph -- c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
