Package: antlr3
Version: 3.2-3
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
While upgrading to the newer antlr3 (3.2-3), I noticed that the
newer antlr3 pulls in maven libmaven2-core-java, which in turn pulls
in about 33 MB of dependencies. Is that absolutely necessary to run
antlr3 ? As maven is a project management tool, I find it weird.
I'm glad a lot of work has been invested into making debian packages
maven-friendly, but that would be great if that didn't mean we have to
force maven on all users of java software.
In short, with maven downgraded to a Recommend, would antlr3 still
work ?
Many thanks,
Vincent
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages antlr3 depends on:
ii default-jre [java2-runtime] 1.6-38 Standard Java or Java compatible R
ii default-jre-headless 1.6-38 Standard Java or Java compatible R
ii libstringtemplate-java 3.2.1-1 StringTemplate templating engine f
ii openjdk-6-jre [java2-runtime] 6b18-1.8-3 OpenJDK Java runtime, using Hotspo
Versions of packages antlr3 recommends:
pn antlr3-gcj <none> (no description available)
antlr3 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
