On Tuesday 29 June 2010, Frans Pop wrote: > > > NACK. The errors are too useful to suppress. > > > > I disagree. The error in question is almost useless. There is no way > > to see which URL was missing, and the message show up in the wrong > > location in the log. A useful error message would make it possible to > > figure out what is wrong. This one do not. :(
Note that the order of the errors does match the order of calls. Together with other info I've always been able to match things up properly. I agree (and said so in my initial reply) that the current situation is not ideal, but that does not make the errors useless. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
