On Tuesday 29 June 2010 14:28:28 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > > KDE might or might not introduce a more generic progress bar application, > > should kdialog --progressbar not suffice. So let us resolve the possible > > conflicts as early as possible. > > However, I don't think that KDE applications may claim the letter "k" as > their "namespace". Or should we also remove packages like kvm-source, > klogd and keepalived?
No. I also don't think that KDE appliKations should Klaim Kino or Kernel or Kfreebsd. But in the Kase of kprogress, both in name and desKription, it sounds like a very generiK tool, but is infaKt a tool specifiK to goto/gosa/fai. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
