On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 23:57 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On lun., 2010-06-21 at 18:14 +0200, Stefano Costa wrote: > > Package: anjal > > Version: 0.3.1+git20100216.f222280-1 > > > > Current version of Anjal in experimental is uninstallable: > > > > st...@gibreel:~$ sudo apt-get install anjal > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree > > Reading state information... Done > > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > > or been moved out of Incoming. > > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > anjal: Depends: libcamel1.2-14 (< 2.30) but 2.30.1-5 is to be > > installed > > Depends: libedataserver1.2-11 (>= 2.29.90) but it is not > > installable > > Depends: libgnome-desktop-2-11 but it is not installable > > Depends: libgtkhtml-editor0 (< 3.30) but 3.30.1-2 is to be > > installed > > Depends: libgtkhtml3.14-19 (< 3.30) but 3.30.1-2 is to be > > installed > > E: Broken packages > > > > Yeah, I'm not exactly sure about anjal status. It seems to have been > dropped upstream, replaced by evolution express mode. Yan, can you > provide more information on this? Should be just drop the package?
I'm sorry for being missing for sometime. I was on a long vacation. You are right, Anjal is no longer actively developed or maintained and people are working on Evolution Express. Well, that's both good or bad. The bad thing is IMHO Anjal's UI is better suited for a netbook than that of EE (for now). The good thing is that EE has inherited most features from Evo so it's more full-featured. I've been using EE for a while and it's quite usable. -- Yan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
