Hi Risko, RISKO Gergely wrote: > Just to add information to this, I would like to note that I can not > keep my offer for maintainership I gave in 540321.
Thanks for posting that information. > I do not use rudel anymore actively as part of my day job, this is why I > lost interest in this. So maybe you should change the ITP at http://bugs.debian.org/551187 to an RFP or even close it. Or do you still intend to maintain rudel in Debian? > I think it also should be noted, that from GNU Emacs 23.2, CEDET is > a builtin, so this need for work will go away if we just wait. :-) Ok, so the main work is to prepare a smooth transition to Emacs 23.2? Apropos, does in that case http://bugs.debian.org/540321 still block http://bugs.debian.org/551187 or does the cedet version from Emacs 23.2 suffice for rudel? Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
