markus schnalke <[email protected]> writes:
> This bug is mainly about cosmetics but it is also about using those
> HTML elements that express exactly what you mean.
>
> Instead of <span class="bold"> use <b> or <strong>.
> Instead of <span class="emphasis"> use <i> or <emph>.
This may make HTML simpler, but the change would actually degrade the
versality. The SPAN elements can be freely manipulated via CSS, whereas
the <B> and <I> tags have a distinct meaning.
> About the headings:
>
> h2.nroffsh {
> background-color: #e0e0e0;
> }
>
> <h2 class="nroffsh">foo</h2>
>
> Can get simplified to:
>
> h2 {
> background-color: #e0e0e0;
> }
>
> <h2>foo</h2>
Likewise. It is good that the headings have distinct identifiers from
the start. This allows the ability to "embed" the HTML somewhere else
and not the interfere with the exixting "H" definitions. Like:
h1
{
/* regular */
}
h2.nroffsh
{
/* from roffit */
}
In this regard I'm inclined to not recommend these changes. Daniel, the
author, can comment more.
I appreciate the very good bug reports you put forward, that is what all
software needs.
Jari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
