On Monday 08 August 2005 16:52, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > I'd suggest to rebuild all required packages (libraries) with > > CFLAGS -Wa,--noexecstack so that assembled modules get tagged > > as not needing executable stacks. > > > > I've rebuilt some packages (liblzo1, openssl, libgdbm3, libelfg0, > > libgcrypt11 and so on) with those flags. For everyone who's > > interested: http://debian.linux-systeme.com/ > > Absolutely not. Either the package needs an executable stack - in > which case this is, simply, wrong - or else it doesn't and whatever is > causing it to be tagged as needing one should be fixed. IIRC it is > usually a matter of annotating assembly files in some way.
well, so I've uploaded a glibc 2.3.5 package with PaX support. ciao, Marc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
