On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 23:58 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Hmm, I see no reason why 127.0.0.2 should be a better choice than > 127.0.1.1, or vice versa. Can you come up with a reason? No special reason I guess,.. I wanted it just to be aligned with Debian's "standard".
> Given that one is as good as the other 127.0.0.2 looks a bit more > straighforward to me, and I think that generally docs should be fixed to > follow what the code does, not the other way round, so I'd probably vote > for changing your manual, and keep the code in place. That said, I > think this is really a minor issue, and I think it wouldn't be really > that bad if debian would deviate here from the rest of the world. So go > ahead with 127.0.1.1 if you want to and really don't want to fix the > documentation instead. You have my blessing that that is OK. > > On top of that, if you can make up a good reason I'd be willing to > change the upstream to 127.0.1.1, btw. So, convince me! I think the best would perhaps be to find out why Debian chose to use 127.0.1.1.... and decide then Cheers, Chris
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
