On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:56:28AM -0700, Kris Jurka wrote: > On 5/30/2010 10:22 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > >On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 01:45:03AM -0700, Kris Jurka wrote:
> >>Apparently you're supposed to use "odbc_config --cflags" to put > >>-DSIZEOF_LONG_INT=X into CFLAGS so unixodbc_conf.h doesn't get > >>included. If that's the case, then what's the point of > >>unixodbc_conf.h at all? Also as noted in bug #422207 odbc_config > >>isn't installed and I personally have no desire to use it. > >"supposed" to? Says who? > Well there's no documentation, but that's the only reason for > odbc_config --cflags to exist isn't it? I wasn't defending or > endorsing it, but just trying to provide some more insight into the > design that I imagine the unixodbc developers think people should be > using. Ok, well, that's not how we're going to be using it. :) There's no reason not to just fix the headers to work as-is. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
