On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Ignace Mouzannar <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:46, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yes, the name is too generic. >> No, "it is already in Ubuntu" is no argument. >> No, "it will lead to some kind of problems for Ubuntu to have it in >> Debian with a different way) is also not an argument. >> Yes, we have and will reject packages because of too generic names >> (several gnustep package come to my mind).
> Here are some alternative names: > - live-usb-creator (as Mehdi suggested earlier) > - iso-usb-creator > - startup-disk-creator (this is what the Gnome menu item reads [1]) > - startup-usb-creator > - ubuntu-usb-creator I can't say I agree, but if we're going to have to do this, we might as well take the opportunity to make it consistent with the .desktop file. Alexander, are you okay with startup-disk-creator? I think if we can get rid of usb in the name, that would be good as it can write to SD cards. I want to avoid using live in the name since, as I previously mentioned, it can write debian-installer based images, which are definitely not live CDs. I don't want to put Ubuntu in the name. It writes more than just Ubuntu images (currently any Debian-based image, but in the future any Linux distribution that uses GRUB2). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
