On Wednesday 10 August 2005 22:12, Christian Reiniger wrote: > On Wednesday 10 August 2005 21:50, MJ Ray wrote: > > Christian Reiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 09 August 2005 12:24, Per Marker Mortensen wrote: > > > > Dotsrc staff wrote: > > > > > * Rsync access is provided from rsync.mirrors.dotsrc.org , i.e. > > > > > a *different* host than mirrors.dotsrc.org/ftp.dk.debian.org . > > > > > We hope this is no problem. > > > > > > > > It seems to be the same host, and seems to be working fine: > > > > > > Only because we don't have the hardware to separate them yet. > > > Please treat them as distinct hosts -- they certainly will be as > > > soon as we can manage it. > > > > I think that means it should have two entries in the mirrors list and > > won't be ftp.dk.debian.org - can anyone confirm/reject that, please? > > > > See http://www.debian.org/mirror/official > > We *can* also tell our firewall to do port forwarding from > mirrors.dotsrc.org:rsync (aka ftp.dk.debian.org:rsync) to > rsync.mirrors.dotsrc.org:rsync . It's just not the most efficient thing > to do...
Correction: I just talked with some people who actually *know* our firewall setup (yeah, sorry..), and got word that the port forwarding would be no problem at all. So -- forget about rsync.mirrors.dotsrc.org and simply use the main host for rsync. -- Christian Reiniger Don't panic--you can always eat at Milliways. - Zaphod Beeblebrox
pgpBkDshTTp3S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
