Hi, On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:17:35AM +0100, Mark Ellis wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 22:08 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > tags 562159 -patch > > thanks > > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 03:46:26PM +0100, Mark Ellis wrote: > > > This is caused by a change in swig from 1.3.37. The attached patch fixes > > > this at source level, unlike the other patches mentioned. Please apply > > > this, python-opensync is completely useless without it. > > > > That patch is for 0.22, unstable has 0.39 and it does not seem to apply > > to that version. > > > > > > Michael > > Sorry, did I attach it to the wrong section ? Yes, the patch is for > 0.22, and needs to be applied to squeeze/testing.
Ah, ok. I am afraid 0.22 will be removed from testing soonish, though. It is basically unmaintained upstream for years now and maintaining it over the squeeze lifetime seems unrealistic. > The python wrapper of 0.39 in unstable is a completely different story, > and I don't believe has any chance of working properly at the moment. Yeah, possibly. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
