tags 582630 + upstream thanks Hi,
On Samstag, 22. Mai 2010, Paul Martin wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 01:28:39PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > True, but wouldnt it be nicer if logrotate intercepted that error and
> > thus surpresses the message? The logrotate config file used says its ok
> > if the log is missing, so IMHO it should be ok too, if the directory is
> > missing.
> logrotate wasn't written with Debian in mind. It's a RedHat program.
I fail to see how this is relevant.
> The only way to fix this properly would be for logrotate to have the
> same sort of logic as an init.d script -- ie. checking for a nominated
> binary to exist.
Yes, but that should be trivial, or? And yes, of course this is an upstream
bug.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
