Am 20.05.2010 16:58, schrieb Hubert Chathi:
No. Having it in the menu is valuable for those who do RAW processing.
Well, I'd agree if you said having the software installed would be valuable for those (I guess: few?) of us doing RAW processing. But those could still benefit from the MIME bindings and open ufraw via the context menus. However, as long as ufraw does not provide a reasonable GUI by itself, I think its better to keep it hidden - at least as long as it is part of a standard desktop installation.
Plus, I believe that there is a consensus in GNOME that applications (e.g. file viewers like eog or evince) which are pretty useless unless opened with a file (i.e. which do not offer a "File -> New" menu) are hidden from the menu and only opened via file context.
I'm not sure why ImageMagick is recommending a GUI tool. It would be better for it to either use dcraw for its raw processing (which is a command-line tool), or if they need to use ufraw-batch, then it may be best to split up ufraw-batch from the ufraw package.
As Bastien pointed out, if you could please split the GUI from the batch processing in this package and imagemagick changes recommends only to the latter, then I'll be satisfied enough to close this bug. ;)
Cheers, Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
