Ivan Baldo <[email protected]> wrote: Hi,
> The owner of the device "saned" and group "lp"? I guess it works, > but... users should fiddle with udev rules? In this case, yes. It's a matter of local policy. There are a number of ways to setup the permissions for saned, depending on what you want to achieve and what level of security you want to ensure. > My personal opinion is that we should come up with a solution that > works out of the box or at least answering some simple questions with > Debconf, not asking users to edit cumbersome rules files and set > strange permissions. The less debconf questions there is, the better. > Isn't there a better solution? MFPs present a single USB device for two physical devices. Unless you go the HP way with an intermediate daemon to arbitrate between print and scan, no, there isn't a better solution at this level. At the hardware level, manufacturers should present 2 USB devices and arbitrate internally. It's not like it's difficult to do. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <[email protected]> | Debian, because code matters more Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | <http://www.debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
