On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:41:44PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote: > > I think that the current way the duplicity handler works can lead to filling > the disks, in a dangerous way. >
Note also that the way the incrementals are kept for old backups doesn't help either : there's no way to implement selective removal of old incrementals, so they help fill up the cache. See #579966 that proposes a new feature for duplicity, that backupninja may use with profit in this respect. Best regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
