On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 18:52 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > I wonder where you did this, since I found no upstream bug report. I've > created > one now. We want to remove libgnomeprint soon, so maybe we should just remove > gbonds from the archive (its popcon is just 27).
I'd rather not. It can't be that hard for me to patch gbonds to rip out libgnomeprint (and thus printing support) if nothing else. I'll prep a new package that does this in a few days. Richard
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
