On 2010-04-08 10:05, martin f krafft <[email protected]> wrote: > also sprach Philipp Weis <[email protected]> [2010.04.06.1943 +0200]: > > * Replacing your script with the new minimal wrapper will not change > > this script behaves at all. Mutt does all the mailto URL parsing > > that your script used to do -- no functionality will be lost. > > But didn't you say that mutt mailto cannot handle arbitrary headers, > like my script can?
Mutt itself does support arbitrary headers in mailto URLs as of now. > > The combination of these two points does break the current > > behavior in that exotic header attributes will no longer work out > > of the box. What do you think would be the right way to alert the > > user about this, and is this even necessary? > > At the very least, there should be a NEWS entry. I also think that > it makes sense to have the wrapper output a warning (e.g. cat the > NEWS stanza) to stdout, nudging the user to stop using the wrapper. > That'll be a self-fulfilling profecy. Sounds reasonable. I'll keep an eye on this and come back to it once the new upstream code is released. Philipp
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
